Moving forward, with Maxon now being ZBrushâs overlords, it may be subscription-only eventually, so plan on tallying those ongoing costs, As of this post, I had to dig through their pages a bit, but a perpetual (non-subscription) license is still around at $895.
2-in-1? You can take my advice or ignore it, but I went down this route before Nomad and before sculpting-on-an-iPad was a thing. Nearly maxed out a Surface Pro 4 to make sure it had enough horsepower to handle ZBrush. ZBrush being an efficient program ran fine on the i7 / 16GB system, but its weakness was the Microsoft Pen. Was it useable? Barely so. Over time, Iâm sure someone might put in the additional practice to make it useable, but for me having already used a Wacom, it was a notable step backward. If all youâre doing with the MS Pen is circling presentation slides, its claimed 1024 levels of pressure sensitivity is faaaaan-tactic. For ZBrush sculpting? It blows. I have zero confidence ANY of the styluses offered in a 2-in-1 are up to the task. And if itâs stylus doesnât cut it, youâre back to needing an external graphics tablet (Wacom, Huion, etc) or a Cintiq equivalent; the latter approaching/exceeding the cost of an iPad Pro or iPad Air with M1 chip.
I went back to using my MacBook Pro for ZBrush work and swapped out a Wacom Bamboo with a Wacom Intuos Pro. If I need the tools ZBrush has to offer, Iâm perfectly happy with this setup. Do I NEED to be in ZBrush all the time though? Nomad & iPad Pro has answered that with an emphatic âNopeâ. THIS voice of opinion comes from someone whoâs only interested in sculpts that ultimately make its way to a resin 3D print. For THIS specific purpose, I donât foresee much else needed beyond the tools that Nomad already has. The ONLY caveat here is that there is NO iPadOS/Android equivalent to ChiTuBox/Lychee thatâs mandatory to orient/scale/support/slice a 3D model in preparation for printing. A PC or Mac will still be needed in this process if for nothing than just running the slicing program.
The iPad/Nomad combo permits an unbelievable level of wide-open freedom to sculpt as casually or as focused as youâd like. The exact moment inspiration strikes, the iPad/Nomad is instant-ON. Some casual shape-finding sessions on a hammock can just as easily be relocated to a more serious detailing session with alpha textures.
From here, ZBrush picks up the baton and offers
- NanoMesh - fine-detail particles like real scales or chain mail
- Vector Displacement - alpha sculpting on steroids
- ZRemesher - reskinning your mesh with better control over topology
âŚthe rest of this Features ICEBERG is huge and deep.
For a resin 3D print that might never exceed 2 inches (5 cm) tall, any work put into chain mail detail may very likely NOT be realized in the final result.(Negating all that ZBrush detailing) If however you anticipate 3D printing 1/6 scale figures (30+ cm) that might be the circumstance that leans on ZBrushâs ability to handle 50 million vertices worth of detail.
To think this out in another way, the 3D printer candidate you might be considering may likely be the determining factor of the program you use. All of the sub-$300 machines will be matched well for what Nomad can output. The level-of-detail for the given (build envelope) size is just about where Nomad can comfortably take you.
For a VISUAL end-product, that is, hyper-detailed models destined for a 4K or 8K display where the mesh has mandatory topology requirements to fit a rigging/animation workflow, youâll need to be spending much of that time in ZBrush. I donât think thereâs such thing as an appropriate âcheap PCâ here. If youâve already dropped $895 for ZBrush, a wheezy $500 PC wonât cut it. Tons of CPU and RAM will allow pushing its new features (Bevel Pro, etc) to the max. More realistically, a $1200 budget to cover computer & monitor is in order. Add ~$100 for an XP Pen or Huion drawing tablet, $350 if reaching for an Intuos Pro.